By:

After six months of hard work, we were sitting together on a warm spring afternoon enjoying a beer in one of Melbourne’s new hipster bars. We had learned a lot, traveled all over Australia and met amazingly passionate people. We’d put together a lean startup with a focus to test a simple business idea and we’d heard countless times how much our tools were needed. There was only one problem. We had failed.

It was over. We’d decided to fold the company. Our hypothesis that Australian Manufacturers would collaborate as a means to an end and thereby solve their problems was false. We had tested it with a dozen SMEs and a group of billion dollar multinationals. In both cases we had failed to get the companies to commit. So we sat there and looked at each other realizing it was a failure we had to embrace and not a success. But how would we cope?

…when you were broke and had to admit to the failure, it seemed a lot easier said than done.

Our problem is one faced by everyone from lone entrepreneurs to global corporations. Things go wrong, perfected plans fall apart and momentum grinds to a halt. We were not alone. But everywhere we looked, phenomenally successful businessmen were telling us to embrace failure, to learn from it and benefit from its edifying nature. It was just when you were broke and had to admit to the failure, it seemed a lot easier said than done.

The lean startup methodology tells us to fail fast to learn fast. Iterate through the build, measure, learn cycle as quickly as possible to improve our product market fit. Top product developers opine on the benefits of failure. The lack of success has even been proven to be a better way to lead to disruptive new ideas than success itself because it forces us to look for alternative strategies (Asaad and Eskandar 2011). The problem is, no one says what to do when it all goes wrong. What to do when you fail.

If we turn to statistics, then the best thing an entrepreneur can do is to get up and try again. Numerous studies show that a second time entrepreneur is more likely to succeed than a first time entrepreneur (Vital 2012). In fact, it has been claimed that one of the reasons why Israel’s startup scene punches so much above its weight is that most entrepreneurs have a number of failures under their belts (Nicholas 2015).

When we get to the bottom of it, innovation is all about taking risks. To drive innovation in large corporations it is critical to have a culture which embraces risk taking because the flip side of taking risks is that failures will occur. A company culture which demands innovation but does not support and accept failure is clearly one which is destined to fail. Obviously this is not to endorse failure due to sloppy work or avoidable mistakes. Failure arising from testing the unknown is the type of failure which can be valuable and must be allowed.

A company culture which demands innovation but does not support and accept failure is clearly one which is destined to fail.

Jorge, one of Internet’s top innovation bloggers and thought leaders (Jorge 2015), recognizes the importance and difficulty of failing. Having been part of a number of failed enterprises he wrote “[I]n order to figure out which ideas will work, people move fast to implement those ideas. I’d argue that more important than that is the ability to recover from failure just as fast”. So what I’d like to know is how do we quickly and sustainably recover from a failure?

Coping with failure

To answer this we turn to the most reliable source of answers – cutting edge research. For companies the latest research points to creating frameworks to support failure. Whether that is failure tolerant leaders, collaborative innovation schemes to share risk or an empathetic corporate culture, there are many ways companies can support the necessary failure involved in any risky innovation (Farson and Keyes 2002). The benefits? Companies which develop such a supportive climate, and provide employees with psychological safety to pursue their initiatives, have been positively related to a number of firm performance measures (Baer and Frese 2003).

For startups and entrepreneurs one of the best ways to deal with failure is to be realistic and not fall victim to the latest wave of romantic headlines about “youngest billionaires”. 90% of startups fail and this applies to you. If you don’t think you are the special 10% but one of the 90% and set yourself the goal of starting three or four startups from the outset (or at least pivoting three or four times), then you will be able to cope with the failures that much better. This has helped me significantly – to know I’m not a lone loser but just like everyone else. It gives me the edge to grit my teeth, dust myself off and go again.

When pursuing multiple businesses at the same time, the failures in one business seem to help raise the chances of success in the other ventures

Another strategy which worked well for me is to launch all three of my startup ideas at the same time while I was still validating the market for each idea. This not only brings you faster to your goal but a Harvard Business Review report even demonstrated that when pursuing multiple businesses at the same time, the failures in one business seem to help raise the chances of success in the other ventures (Ucbasaran D et al 2011)! The added benefit is that it will force you to focus on the core of each business and help you stick to doing the minimum to test each idea instead of adding unnecessary bells and whistles too early – a core part of methodologies such as the Lean Startup.

Coping with failure is important not only for us psychologically but for the economy at large but many people simply don’t know how. As Jorge put it succinctly “Failure isn’t the goal as it relates to innovating. Rather, your ability to recover from failure fast is just as important as your ability to fail fast.(Jorge 2015)

By Evan Shellshear

About the author

Co-Founder and director of AMFORCE, CEO of Simultek, Evan Shellshear has extensive international experiences in delivering high quality applied research results and innovation. He has delivered technical solutions to large multinationals around the globe. He is currently based in Australia.

References

Vital A 2012. Will I Succeed With My Startup? The odds of making it. Funders and Founders, http://fundersandfounders.com/will-i-succeed-with-my-startup-the-odds-of-making-it/, retrieved 20th of March 2016

Asaad W F and Eskandar E N 2011, Encoding of Both Positive and Negative Reward Prediction Errors by Neurons of the Primate Lateral Prefrontal Cortex and Caudate Nucleus, The Journal of Neuroscience, 7 December 2011, 31(49): 17772-17787; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3793-11.2011

Nicholas J 2015, How Australia can create startup culture as successful as Israel’s, Business Insider Australia, 30 November 2015, http://www.businessinsider.com.au/how-australia-can-create-startup-culture-as-successful-as-israels-2015-11, retrieved 20th of March 2016

Jorge 2015, Your ability to recover from failure fast is just as important as your ability to fail fast, Game-Changer, http://www.game-changer.net/2015/07/23/culture-of-innovation/#.Vu6ESHrkqFW, retrieved 20th of March 2016

Farson R and Keyes R 2002, The Failure-Tolerant Leader, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2002/08/the-failure-tolerant-leader, retrieved 20th of March 2016.

Baer M and Frese M 2003, Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of organizational behavior, 24(1), 45-68.

Ucbasaran D, Westhead P and Wright M 2011, Why Serial Entrepreneurs Don’t Learn from Failure, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2011/04/why-serial-entrepreneurs-dont-learn-from-failure/ar/1, retrieved 20th of March 2016.

Image credit: motivating quote from Shutterstock.com